Skip to main content

Immigration Advocacy

Modern immigration law is grounded primarily in the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, also known as the Hart-Cellar Act.  This act changed the way quotas on immigrants are allocated and ended the national origins formula put in place by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921.  The 1965 Act marked a change in U.S. immigration policy, which had discriminated against non-northern Europeans. 

The Hart-Cellar Act opened the doors of the U.S. to “those who can contribute most to this country—to its growth, to its strength, to its spirit.”  The law created a preference system that focused on immigrants’ skills and family relations with citizens or U.S. residents.

Immigration has been part of the national political debate for many years.  In recent years, comprehensive immigration reform has been unaddressed by Congress.  In absence of reform. President Trump has proposed building a wall on the U.S. - Mexican border, deporting millions of undocumented immigrants, placing limitations on asylum in the U.S., and imposing a temporary ban on Muslins entering the country.  The Administration has also proposed regulations, such as the Department of Homeland Security’s “public charge” eligibility which limits citizenship to those who access federal funding. 

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, more than 43 million immigrants reside in the United States, about 14% of the population.  The undocumented immigrant population is approximately 11 million.  In 2017, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency reported a 26% drop in the number of undocumented apprehended at the southern border from the year before.  At the same time arrests of undocumented immigrants increased by 40% as a result of increased enforcement by the Trump Administration.

In 2016, approximately 1.2 million immigrants were granted legal permanent residency in the U.S., more than two-thirds of which were admitted for family unification reasons.  Other categories included 12%for employment-based preferences, 10% for refugees, 4% for diversity, and 3% for asylees.  At the end of 2017, more than 4 million were awaiting visas according to the State Department.

Most Americans believe immigration is good for the United States, with 71% agreeing according to a 2017 Gallup Poll.

Current Situation

The last time Congress seriously considered comprehensive immigration reform was in 2013.  Comprehensive immigration reform legislation would address the demand for high and low-skilled labor, the future legal status of undocumented immigrants (i.e. path to citizenship) living in the U.S., the future of “dreamers” (children brought to this country by undocumented parents), and border security.

Passing comprehensive immigration reform is crucial not only for national security, but for the thousands of families that fear deportation or separation from their families. 

Update: CIS Foreign Offices Set to Close

 The Department of Homeland Security’s U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services Division will close its international offices in 20 cities around the world by the end of 2019. These closures are an attempt by the Trump Administration to save funds and divert spending to address the backlog of applications from asylee seekers crossing the southern border of the U.S. Refugee advocates argue that any potential savings will be offset from the decrease in fees assessed on refugees seeking resettlement services. Advocates also note that office closures will result in the loss of logistical support to lawful American citizens, as well as to refugees seeking to bring family members to the U.S., other asylum seekers, families adopting children internationally, and members of the military and their families, applying for citizenship. Additionally, these offices also played a key role in immigration fraud detection. (Source: New York Times and other news reports).

LSS/NCA Comments on DHS Proposed “Public Charge” Rule

A November 19th letter from CEO Christine Connell provides LSS/NCA’s comments on a Department of Homeland Security proposed rule that significantly expands the definition of what benefits constitutes “public charge” for purposes of legal immigration.  The rule published in the Federal Register on October 10th  (DHS Docket No. USCIS-2010-0012), with a comment deadline of December 10th, significantly alters the current practice that limits public charge benefits to persons who would likely depend on public cash benefits or long-term care at the government’s expense by also including TANF, SSI SNAP, Medicaid, Medicare Part D and Section 8 housing assistance.  The rule would force immigrants to choose between seeking benefits for themselves or their families on a short term basis versus the opportunity to attain or maintain legal immigrant status.  LSS/NCA strongly urges DHS not to promulgate the rule, which is yet another way of hurting immigrants.